People who don’t want to read The Martian in case the science is too complicated should be informed that it contains the lines “The best way to store the ingredients of water is to make them be water”, “It is of course dangerous to set off an explosive device on a spacecraft”, and “If I cut a hole in the wall of the hab, the air won’t stay inside any more”.
I love this fucking book
“I’ve said the words kilowatt-hours-per-sol so many times they’ve lost all meaning so I’m going to call them pirate-ninjas.
“So I need to generate nine hundred pirate-ninjas…”
there’s an entire chapter dedicated to him wondering how the cubs are doing while he’s stuck on mars, dying
I like the part where the guys on Earth are like “He thinks we all gave up on him, and that he’s completely alone. I wonder what he’s thinking about right now.”
And he’s like “How come Aquaman can control whales?”
Mark Watney is such a great example of how to teach to laymen. Andy Weir wrote a book about a man who basically gives the reader a 369 page science lesson and it’s literally never boring or too complicated or patronising. He uses language that is accessible to the reader, removes technical jargon, adds in humour and all without belittling the reader or making them feel stupid for being given the simplified explanation.
Tag: science
You can’t be intelligent and a Christian, the two are as separate as religion and science. You’ll become cleverer once you become an atheist as you drop the nonsense of faith
Hey anon,
I’m not going to claim intelligence for myself, rather, here is a list of Christians:
Isaac Newton
Alexander Pope
Galileo
Mary Seacole
Florence Nightingale
Descartes
Edward Gibbon
Hildegard of Bingen
Francis Bacon
Maria Gaetana Agnesi
Joseph Priestley
Mary Anning
John Locke
Michael Farraday
Charles Babbage
Georges Lemaitre
Kathleen Lonsdale
Theodosius Dobzhansky
C S Lewis
Tolkien
Soren Kierkegaard
Leo Tolstoy
Francis Collins
Alister McGrath
Mary Higby Schweitzer
Eamon DuffyWho were/are pretty intelligent and contributed something to the world. There are plenty more to list and learn about it. They aren’t just scientists, but philosophers, historians, writers, and reformers. These are all people who had belief in Christ and culture and science. Faith in Jesus does not mean being unintelligent nor does it prevent an interest in science.
God bless
And some additional intelligent Christians:
Lise Meitner (she was born Jewish but converted to Lutheranism)
Caroline Herschel
Joseph Banks
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Johann Sebastian Bach
Franz Schubert
Charlotte Brontë
Gregor Mendel
Maria Mitchell
Blaise Pascal
Gottfried Leibniz
Robert Boyle
Georg Friedrich Händel
Johannes Kepler
Antoine Lavoisier
Alessandro Volta
Phillis Wheatley
Werner Heisenberg
Louis Pasteur
Jaroslav Durych
Max Planck
Rosalind Picard
Sir Robert Boyd
Mother Noella Marcellino
Pretty YendeNot only does faith not prevent an interest in science, but sometimes it actively encourages it. To quote Galileo: ‘I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect would have us forego them.’ A love of God can make people motivated to discover the secrets of what He has provided for us.
And this doesn’t just pertain to Christians either. The Islamic Golden Age isn’t called that for nothing. At the same time as the emergence of Islam there was a great boom of scholarly achievement in the Muslim world, encouraged by Quranic doctrines.
Nice try, Anon, but you don’t need to be an atheist to have a brain.
I also have to add:
Olivier Messiaen
Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy
Maurice Durufle (probably)
John Lennox
Alvin Plantinga
John Polkinghorne
Georges Lemaitre (yes, the Big Bang guy)
Fyodor Dostoyevsky
William Lane Craig
Rembrandt van Rhijn
Jan VermeerThis belief that religion (any religion, not just Christianity) is irrational, unable to be intellectual, and just pretty damn stupid is something I encounter a lot in academia. Many people are surprised to hear that I’m a Christian as well as an academic archaeologist, as if the two are opppsed or irreconcilable. I don’t know if this is only a UK based experience or something other believers in Christ live with and through. Again, I don’t claim intelligence or wisdom, especially in respects to the people listed above, but having faith or a religious belief does not automatically mean a person is devoid of reason, logic, and intelligence (of course, such things are historical products and cultural constructs and we must be aware of the continuing impact of enlightenment etc thought).
Ya’ll
Gregor Mendel was a monk, and the father of modern genetics
A priest theorized the Big Bang
A catholic nun was the first woman to get a degree in computer sciences
Ya’ll need to stop with this “Religious people can’t be intelligent”
This is a particularly elegant explanation of why why we don’t fill blimps with Hydrogen anymore.
Source: Business Inider
No, this is a particularly elegant explanation why we should put flaming lances on cars and ramp them off of stuff 😃
midgardian etiquette 101: when going to their homes, hang your coat first or in some cases, your mjolnir.
naw maybe it’s actually asgardian custom to check your weapons at the door
It was medieval custom to check your weapons at the door of the meadhall before greeting the king of the place you were going to. It was courteous and showed respect. You can see it in Beowulf.
what i don’t understand is how that hook can hold the mjolnir.
the hook is worthy
the hook is worthy
Peter Pan would disagree.
I’ve not read the comics but I always figured Mjolnir wasn’t heavy so much as stubborn, and if it decided it didn’t wanna move it just wouldn’t. It sits on Loki, rather than crushing him in Thor 1, and in Avengers it rests on the floor of the ship, and trying to pick it up Hulk starts breaking the floor with his weight, but Mjolnir doesn’t seem to weight anything at all (If it was as heavy as Hulk implied, it would drag the whole ship to the ground right?). Mjolnir isn’t heavy, cos its not going down, instead it is a fixed point and everything else just moves around it. Hence, the hook doesn’t hold it, it merely remains in place.
so what you’re trying to say is that Mjolnir is like a chicken head
instead it is a fixed point and everything else just moves around it.
OK SO WHAT YOU ARE SAYING
IS THAT WHEN THIS HAMMER WAS FORGED IN THE HEART OF A STAR IT BECAME A FIXED QUANTUM POINT
AND THE UNIVERSE MOVES AROUND IT—AND THOR IS THE ONLY ONE WITH THE PROPER RESONANCE TO INTERACT WITH IT ON A QUANTUM LEVEL
AND SO HE IS THE ONLY ONE WITH THE LEVERAGE REQUIRED TO SHIFT THE REST OF THE UNIVERSE AROUND THE FIXED POINT THAT IS MJOLNIRTHIS MAKES SO MUCH SENSE
DUDE YOU GUYS SCIENCED THORS HAMMER THAT IS AWESOME
i just… can’t have this not on my blog.
This got really sciencey really fast and my mind is blown
via reddit.com
damn, guess fetuses arent “parasitic clumps of cells” after all
People who consider babies parasites are sociopaths. It isn’t even a correct classification lmao it is a product of natural human reproduction. Its like people forgot that the actual purpose of sex is to reproduce.
I keep trying to like red wine like a grown-up but like … it’s rotten grapes, guys. You can drink things that don’t taste like rotten grapes. Why
Okay I don’t know when this post is from (I came across it stalking multiple blogs). But in case this might help, here is a brief science/wine lesson.
To start off, some facts:
-White wine is made from sweet pulp inside of the grape (minus the seeds).
-Red wine is made from both the skin and the grape (and the seeds and stems…sometimes? Can’t remember).
-Tannin is the substance found in red wines, coffee, dark chocolate. Tannins are responsible for the bitter taste in those foods.
-Tannins are found in the skin of the grape, as well as the seeds and the stems. Therefore, most red wines will have tannins, versus most whites will not have tannins.
-Red wines vary in level of tannins, depending on variety of grape, climate, and fermentation process. Pinot noir tends to be very low tannin. Shiraz/Syrah, choice of poison for our beloved brunette surgeon, is very heavy on the tannins.
-Some white wines (most commonly Chardonnay) are aged in oak barrels instead of metal containers. Oak barrels have tannins, which seeps into the wine during the fermentation process. That’s why Chardonnays tend to be “drier” aka it has tannins.
-White wines like Sauvingnon Blancs are usually fermented in steel barrels (aka no tannins. Aka usually very fruity and light and sweet).
Your ability to taste tannins is genetic.
There is a genetic marker determining whether your taste cells are sensitive to tannins.
Basically two people can drink the exact same wine and have wildly different reactions because:
1. Person A can’t taste tannins, so they taste the actual wine flavor.
2. Person B can taste tannins, and that tends to overpower ALL the other flavors in the wine. Basically all they taste is tannins and none of the wine.I am super tannin sensitive, so if I drink a wine like Cabernet Sauvignon (very tannin heavy, aka “very dry”, it tastes like bitter ethanol alcohol to me, whereas my best friend can’t taste tannins so the same wine is maybe a little bitter but they can actually taste the grape and different flavors. To her, a wine like Sauv Blanc is too sweet, tastes like sugar water. But to me it tastes good.
So unless it’s the taste of the alcohol or all wines you hate, chances are you might hate the taste of red wine, especially the heavier red wines, because taste the tannin overpowers everything else. And all you taste is bitter bitter ethanol bitter more ethanol.
More tannin info:
-Tannins bind to fat.-This is why tannin heavy wines are recommended with fatty foods (Shiraz and steak). Whenever you eat food with high fat content, the fat builds up on your tongue. A sip of red wine will bind with the fat on your tongue and clear it away. That’s why the sip of wine between bites of fat heavy foods is considered a palate cleanser.
-By that logic, this is why white wines are recommended with low fat foods, like fish. Salmon is fattier than most fish, which is why Chardonnay (tannin heavy white wine) or Pinot Noir (low tannin red wine) is recommended with salmon.
-People who are sensitive to tannins can drink tannin heavy red wines with fatty food and generally the wine won’t taste gross. The fat on your tongue (from that steak) will bind with the tannin and neutralize the tannin taste. Aka the only time I ever drink Cabernet Sauvignon or Shiraz is with a steak or heavy, creamy pasta. Aka never bc I don’t often eat either.
-The reason dairy helps coffee taste better is because the fat in milk/creams binds with the tannins in coffee and neutralizes the bitter taste. This is why people who can’t taste tannins can generally drink coffee black without milk (sugar is a different story). It’s also why almond milk in coffee is the worst idea (almond milk is already bitter and has no fat).
More wine facts:
-90% of the “aromas” of wine are marketing BS-You know the labels that say like “cherry with a hint of blackberry?” There’s no real way to infuse cherry or blackberry into grape wine without screwing with the fermentation process. It’s all created by the wine marketing industry to sell you win. Sometimes if you smell cherry before you drink the wine, you might taste it in the wine (because majority of flavor comes from smell). Or if you think there is cherry flavor in the wine, your brain can trick your taste buds into tasting it.
-The only true flavors found in real grape wine are grapes (obviously), oak/earthy flavor (the barrels), vanilla (barrels, oak sticks), tannins. (There are a few others but can’t remember. I think maybe cinnamon?).
-People’s perception of wine often affect how good it tastes to them. Social psychology studies show that people will rate the exact same wine differently if they’re told the wines are different in price. (They rated the more expensive wine as tastier).
tl;dr
Whether you can taste tannins is genetic. Exact same wines taste different for different people depending on your genetic makeup. If you’re sensitive to tannins, red wines won’t taste like anything other than bitter alcohol. Genetics/tannins are why people generally have preferences for red or whites.this is extremely informative and i have learned a thing about myself, which is that i CLEARLY inherited the tannin-tasting genes from my teatotaling mother and not from my dad who subsists entirely on espresso and cabernet sauvignon.
Me: *falling asleep to an audiobook on the science of the gut*
Book: saliva is actually filtered blood!
Me: ʕʘ‿ʘʔ
Me: ʕʘ‿ʘʔ
Book: saliva also contains a painkiller that is stronger than morphine, but we don’t produce a lot of it otherwise we’d be constantly high
Me: ʕʘ Д ʘʔ
Opiorphin is 6x stronger than morphine and actually contains an anti-depressant compound which is why some doctors believe it’s linked to comfort eating
Everyone spit on me so I won’t be depressed
Video Clip SS218421 (Tardigrade Walking Through Algae)
Tardigrade (Hypsibius dujardini) walking through algae, microscope view.
Tardigrades are commonly known as water bears or moss piglets. They are found in practically every habitat on Earth, from hot springs to beneath ice sheets, and are renowned for their toughness.
See More Tardigrade Videos
Experiments have shown they can survive being frozen to nearly absolute zero and heated to 150 degrees Celsius. They have survived pressures of more than 6000 atmospheres, and have survived after prolonged exposure to the vacuum and radiation found in space.
In unfavorable conditions they can dehydrate to 1% of their normal water content and remain alive in stasis for over a decade. In more normal conditions, they prefer moist environments where they feed on algae and bacteria.
This tardigrade is often used as a model organism in biological research, and its genome is being sequenced.
© Sinclair Stammers / Science Source
BABYBOY
he is SO fucking valid
oh my god they did it!
This is probably the most impressive and beautiful thing I’ve seen in years.
This is amazing. As much as i joke about wanting new legs, I hope this gives amputees much wanted freedom.